The battle of Malazgirt yet another lie

The battle of Malazgirt yet another lie

Introduction

The articles written on history by Anoosh Raavid are from direct and real observations of socio historic evolutions and the science of history-geography which is presented using the 21^st century knowledge and technology. The articles evolve with the institution of future predictions and are somehow re-written from time to time. I do not use history books that tell lies nor do I use religious texts, of course those books that do not contradict natural and social evolutionary laws of history are used. I would recommend those interested in history and social evolution to read them and view then from an anti-traditionalist and anti classic point. One should view each people and rulers in all parts of the world according to the thinking and behavior of the times they exist and bear in mind this important factor that most of our information about history stems from the colonial and imperialist era. One should view history as it is and not as Hollywood wants to portray it.

Note, - all those with extreme nationalist or religious view please refrain from reading or leaving a comment. To go to the main blog please click here.

The battle of Malazgirt yet another lie

The paper battle of Malazgirt in which according to Westerners, Colonialists and the Church the Byzantine army was destroyed by the Seljuqs was undoubtedly one of the most defining battles of history. They say that after the battle of Malazgirt nothing could stop the march of the Muslims, the Turks, the Kurds and the Fars who were immigrating to Asia Minor and were intended on entering Europe. In fact they talk about a battle after which the Muslims, the Turks entered Bosporus and Europe and Asia Minor and by doing so are denying a vast area of the historic geography of greater Iran. Our historians with their eyes and ears closed only say that whatever the enemies have said are true and busy themselves with religious chants and grandiose ideas about the history of Iran. There is no reference to this paper battle in any historic text books and those who invented this lie have only managed to write a few lines about such an important event and relying on 20^th century storytellers have sexed up the lie. Please refer to the links for more detailed analysis. I shall now analyze the paper battle paragraph by paragraph and invite only those specially involved with history read them,-

Paper battle,- Year 1063 Alb Arsalan the powerful Saljuqi sultan accompanied by his military and court entourage entered Armenia with the aim of fortifying his borders. The emperor of Eastern Roman empire Romanovs Euoganos whose empire had been successful in preventing the entry of the invading Muslims including Turks and Fars from its frontiers took advantage of the small number of the Saljuqi and blocked the way for the men of Alb Arsalan. In the plains of Malazgirt which lies in Turkey, the agile Saljuqi army led by the Sultan himself while they had transferred all the tents and stables to the back lined up against the army of the Eastern Roman empire. The lightly armed mounted men of the Saljuqi army attacked the heavy armed men of the Roman Empire and tore their hearts. With the destruction of the heart of the army of eastern Rome defeat came about and they started retreating and the little after the eastern Roman Empire was overrun by the Saljuqi Turks.

Anoosh Raavid, - In the 11^th century all of Asia Minor (Turkey) and Iran Minor (Caucuses) was historic land of Iran and the territory of the Saljuqis. Borders were defined by the tribes and not as in the geopolitics of the colonial era. The colonialists talk about the invading Muslims, Turks Kurds and Fars alike in order to say that in the land of greater Iran Iranians did not exist and have only just arrived here! They underestimate the huge Religious and tribal institutions which were very well formed. They invent battles without having any idea about armies and wars in different historic stages and defeat an imaginary Empire by the Turks!

Paper battle, - The capture of the Roman emperor by the Turks after centuries of war and bloodshed were a defining point in the history of Islam. It was soon after this battle that the court of Constantinople agreed to pay an annual fee to the court of Isfahan in return for the emperor. Nezam Al Molk the minister of Alb Arsalan received the Romans who had come to pay the fee in the city of Kashgar in order to show off the greatness of his empire. Today Kashgar lies in the Chinese province of Chuan Kiang.

Anoosh Raavid, - By saying “centuries of war”, they want to give geographical legitimacy to the Church. The annual expenditure of a country in return for their emperor is a giveaway which diminishes the importance of their capital or perhaps they had other reasons to say this which I shall see into in the future. In the mid colonial era when they wrote so much such nonsense they really confessed to the vastness of greater Iran.

Paper battle, - The battle of Malazgirt was a beginning for the fall of the fortified walls off the eastern Roman Empire against the Muslims. From then on Muslim Turkish tribes who migrated from Central Asia armed the Ghuzz systematically and penetrated deep into the territory of the Roman Empire which eventually caused a reaction by the Romans. The reaction of the Romans was a propaganda war in the Christian world,- that if no action was taken then the Muslims would open the doors of Europe by occupying Constantinople and the whole Christian world would be invaded by the Muslims. It was exactly at this time that a deep division in the Christian world appeared. Eastern Christianity separated itself officially from Catholic Christianity as “Orthodox”. The announcement of this separation offended the Pope and he reluctantly accepted this bitter reality. Defeat in Malazgirt and advance in Anatolia was faced with propaganda by a priest called Petros in the West who talked of the atrocities of the Muslims over the Christians.

Anoosh Raavid,- They wrote the main points of this paper battle to create borders for the Church and hence talk of the invading Muslims crossing these borders afterwards and started the historic propaganda war amongst the religions, however they hide the true important religious facts behind the paper battle.

Paper battle, - Because of these propaganda and the call for assistance by the Eastern Roman emperor Europe was emerged in much excitement. Pope Urban the second towards the end of the 11^th century in a gathering in Claremont issued the order to attack Muslim lands especially Palestine in order to free Christian lands from the Muslims. After the order was issued Europe was inflamed and unemployed knights, rich feudals, also European monarchy and their peasants all declared themselves ready for war. The order of the Pope was the beginning of a two hundred year bloody war that was to engulf the Mediterranean coast on the Muslim side.

Anoosh Raavid, - As I have said in the structure of social evolution, Europe was passing through the last stage of Feudalism and there was talk of the new Bourgeoisie era and the Church was afraid of that fact so one of the tricks was to declare the Crusades and such and write a few lines about the paper battle of Malazgirt.

Paper Battle, - the first attack of the Christians on the shores of Asia Minor who intended on Aras Moghadas was repelled by their massacres by Gholeij Arsalan one of the heads of the clans living there. In total, eight Crusade wars were fought and even Constantinople the capital of Eastern Roman Empire was captured by the Crusaders who kept if for 5 years. At the time of the offensive of the Crusaders onto the Islamic lands, the Saljuqi Turks ruled almost all the Mediterranean Sea to its most eastern point. As a result of these wars one of the most powerful military governments of the Islamic world came to existence which was the Ayyubids. The founder of this dynasty, Selah Al Din Ayyubid by seeing the political languor of the Fatimid did away with their rule and founded his own dynasty. By conquering towns and cities along the Mediterranean Sea coast the Christians established feudal style governments and continued towards Jerusalem which fell soon afterwards. The Islamic Jihad headed by the Ayyubids which took over the whole Muslim world placed as its main aim the freeing of the lost lands. In the 200 years that the eight Crusade wars lasted many famous European kings participated such as Richard the Lion Heart. Although the historians believe that the Crusades wars ended in 1298 by the capture of the last Crusaders stronghold by the Egyptian rulers according to Catholic encyclopedia however these wars lasted until the establishment of the Ottomans, the capture of Constantinople and their offensive into the heart of Europe. The Christians were driven out of Palestine after 200 years of war.

Anoosh Raavid, - I will soon write about the fabricated Crusades. Them who talk about the powerful governments of Greater Iran are the new age military elite; the inventors of the Crusaders and call the sporadic attacks of bandits, the conquest of Jerusalem. They also fabricated the Islamic Jihad and the invented Lion Heart. As evidence to their lies they swear to the Catholic encyclopedia and write about Palestine being the birth place of Christianity so that they can come back to those lies in this day and age.

Paper Battle, - The Byzantine empire under direct threat from the Turks saw fit to take measures. Empress Eulogia wanted to marry someone who could put an end to the repeated attacks of the Turks so accepted the proposal by Roman Diogin one of the Byzantine royals and handed him the Empire. The new emperor who was an experienced commander once in power started gathering and organizing troops from Macedonia, Thrace and Greece. Moreover he made use of Turkish Ughuz (Turkmens) and Pachanghs, even with the help of the Normans, French, Slovaks, Germans, Armenians and Abkhazians expanded his group. His aim was to kick out the Turks from the lands of the Roman Empire and the occupation of Islamic land. Up until then the Turks had managed to capture Galaharjish, Malazgirt, Éclat and Manbij and defeat the emperor´s army hence a third war would be crucial and defining destiny. The emperor Roman Divgen before mobilizing his troops appeared in Sofia´s church before a golden cross and prayed and on the 13^th of March 1071 the troops began moving. The Roman´s gears were carried by 3000 carts of which 1000 were carrying arms and military equipment.

Anoosh Raavid,- for the simple minded they create fairy tales in order to distract them and repeat the same kind of stories as they did for the Greeks and the Moguls but have no options as to confess that they were constantly defeated. And in order to glamorize the story further they call the Sofia´s mosque a church and the troops in stead of practicing tactics are put behind a golden cross in order to pray but at the same time in order to save face they mention 3000 military carts.

Paper Battle, - In the troops there was the biggest stone canon in the world which was being carried by 1200 men and was capable of projecting stones weighing 400 to 500kgs.The emperor was so certain of his victory that he had appointed representatives in the Islamic lands and had ordered the destruction of mosques and the erection of churches in their place. At this time Sultan Alp Arsalan was in Damascus and was preparing for a trip to Egypt when the ambassador of Byzantine called into him and asked for the return of Malazgirt, Éclat and Arjeish. In fact this gesture was intended for fooling the Sultan Alp Arsalan because the Roman troops had already begun their movement prior to the ambassador calling.

Anoosh Raavid,- They made the biggest impossible cart and ordered the destruction of mosques on paper, note that such rhetoric about destroying mosques belongs to the first stage of bourgeoisie colonization and this mentality simply did not exist at the time of the paper battle. When the story tellers realized that they had said so much nonsense they also added at the end that it was to “fool” the emperor.

Paper battle, - the Roman army advanced as far as Sebasteia and the generals did not see wise to advance any further so the Roman emperor decided on staying put and fighting the Islamic troops wherever they were confronted so he sent a 30 thousand men army to Éclat and himself headed towards Malazgirt and conquered the fortress there. The 30.000 men army which was also carrying the Golden Cross was defeated by Emir Sonduk and even the men sent to gather information on their fate were eliminated. The Golden Cross was sent to Alp Arsalan which he forwarded to the Caliphate in Bagdad.

Anoosh Raavid,- by reading the above sentence one realizes the emptiness of the whole saga, 30.000 men and those sent afterwards all disappear and there is no talk of the Cross then suddenly a Cross appears and is sent to Bagdad and Malazgirt is captured!!! The author has not described any military operation and was probably a priest with a middle ages mentality.

Paper lie,- Sultan Alp Arsalan on the 27^th of April 1027 leaves Damascus on hearing the advance of the Roman army and by crossing the Euphrates river enters Azerbaijan and anchors in Khoy. This trip was made so quickly that the Roman emperor could not have imagined. Sultan Alp Arsalan arranged for his wife and family and the treasury to go to Tabriz by his minister and in order for the Turkish lands not to come under attack, he left Khoy and headed westwards and anchored in the plains of Malazgirt.

Anoosh Raavid, - In the new century in Europe people had heard many stories told by drunken seamen who claimed to be captains and globe trotters who used to gather people around them and tell such strange stories in order to make money for their drinks, one of them was Marco Polo and some of these tales made their way into travellers book. The author of the battle of Malazgirt creates ministers and treasury for a government that belonged to the tribal religious period of social history.

The paper battle, - With him there was an army of 54.000 men which were supposed to confront 200.000 men of Byzantine and although it was a difficult task nevertheless with a brave commander like Sultan Alp Arsalan and commanders like Suleiman Shah, Mansur, Poursogh, Bussan, Savtakin, Aytakin, Taren Igloo, Deylamaj Igloo, Ahmad Shah and Dodo Igloo it was not impossible. One of the finer tricks of the Turks was that they had captured all the strategic hilltops and in order to avoid being left without water they controlled all the small water streams of the area. After some time the Roman army reached that area too and set up camp in a distance of 5-6km away.

Anoush Raavid,- The numbers they talk about require huge logistics and by mentioning a few strategic hilltops and heroes names they pretend to portray a military side to their story but what they do not know is that with such unimportant facts the story is not militarized.

The paper battle,- Although war seemed inevitable nevertheless Sultan Alp Arsalan sent two ambassadors to the Roman empire to suggest Khoy as being agreed to be the frontier city between the two empires( Khoy would remain part of the Saljuqis territory and its western part would belong to the Roman empire. Firstly a peace agreement would prevent bloodshed of thousands of men which was national and religious custom of the Turks and secondly sufficient information would be gained from the Byzantine army. For this task ambassador Caliphate Ibn Al Mahlaban and Savtakin the Conqueror of the Caucasus were chosen.

Anoush Raavid,- They aim to push back the frontiers with the church as far back as Khoy using words from an Iranian ruler so that they can make geo-political use of it in the future and to lose track add a few red herrings too.

The paper battle, - The Roman emperor received the men of Sultan Alp Arsalan with ridicule because it showed his fear of war. For this reason he said they could talk about peace in Rome and I will not retreat without conquering Islamic land and take revenge on what came over the Byzantine lands and by saying so showed his confidence in winning the war.

Anoush Raavid, - Yet another emphasis on frontiers which did not exist at the time because people lived in tribal societies and the fact that Muslims were cruel.

The paper Battle, - hen by asking whether Isfahan was more beautiful or Hamadan and hearing that Isfahan by Ibn Al Mahlaban, he continued: (I had heard about the cold weather I Hamadan, we will therefore stay in Isfahan and the horses in Hamadan). Savtakin facing such derogatory comments replied: (The fact that your horses will stay in Hamadan is certain but I am not sure where you will stay!) After the return of the men from the Turkish army, Sultan Alp Arsalan together with his commanders and the great Imam Bokhara walked up a hill and viewed the Roman army and then consulted his men. The Imam by saying that they were fighting for Allah and that God was behind them emphasized that the war started the day after as it was a Friday and Fridays are sacred days for Muslims.

Anoush Raavid, - Conversations that are rife in old stories and have no documentation and are only said in order to sweeten the tales.

The paper battle, - That night no one slept in the camp, the mounted Turkish soldiers attacked the Romans in order to weaken their morale. The sound of the war drums and horns were heard uninterruptedly and this was particularly annoying to the Romans although they too were preparing for war the day after by dancing and celebrating. On Friday the whole army stood for the Friday prayers with military uniform and the great Sultan gave this speech: my commanders and soldiers although we number few and they number more than us, that is not important as all the Muslims are now praying for our victory so I want to go for the enemy, I am either victorious and achieve our objective or I am killed, made a martyr and go to Heaven. Those who agree follow me and those who do not go away wherever they wish. Today there are no people who give orders and no people taking orders, today we are all the same, I am one of you one of the worriers. Those who follow me and are made martyr go to Heaven and those who survive get their hands on the prize. Those who do not follow me are burnt in Hell and are not honored in this world either.

Anoush Raavid, - This too is said to sweeten the story and there is nothing historically substantial or substantiated according to geographic or historic perspectives.

The paper battle, - When the Sultan´s speech finished all the soldiers expressed their support for him by shouting and yelling! This sent shivers down the spines of the Romans. Then Alp Arsalan threw aside his bow and arrow and picked up his sword and said that in this way he would fight in the front line. He tied the tale of his horse and his commanders followed suit he was wearing white clothes and as his last words he said: this is my martyrdom clothes, if I am killed in battle then bury me with this clothes and my son Malak Shah will inherit power may you all obey him).

Anoush Raavid,- as if the liar who told this tale only knew bow and arrow, he did not know that tying the horses tail was a custom that belonged to the Hones a thousand year prior to this date and hat the kings never appointed successors in the battlefield.

The paper battle, - After this speech the Turkish commanders attacked the infidel enemy and their soldiers followed suit. The plains of Malazgirt were covered in dust and the Great War had begun….In this war the Tiran tactic was also put to practice. For this reason the head of the command was the Sultan, in his right flank Suleiman the son of kutalmish and the felt flank Amir Sundook. The rest of the army was split into four sides and hide behind the hills. The Byzantine army was also well equipped. The right flank was under the command of general Aliyantsin and the Uz were on this side. On the left flank general Byrinius was the commander and the Pahang’s were fighting on his side. The central command was under the Emperor himself. The reserves were under the command of the Emperor´s son Andronick.

Anoush Raavid,- The author of these lies repeats what he has heard form the lying travellers of the time about Iranian battles without referring to anything specific and in no way this story reflects a war between two societies at different stages of socio-cultural evolution.

The paper battle, - With the attack of the Turkish army into the heart of the byzantine troops, they too were drawn into the battle. After a little resistance the Turkish army started withdrawing steadily. The Romans started chasing after them and the Turkish reserves saw the opportunity to launch a surprise attack on the Romans. When Alp Arsalan realized that his men had gone far enough outside their base ordered their return and the attack and so by doing the enemy was encircled and destroyed. The right and the left flanks of the Romans when faced with being surrounded started a counter attack. The Ozughs and the Pachanghs understanding the language of the Turks left the Roman army and joined Islamic army on the opposite side. The battle that had started in the afternoon was over by the evening and the huge Roman army was destroyed with all its military equipment and many were dead and many taken hostage, Greater Manjigh was taken over by the Turks.

Anoush Raavid,- So what happened to all those 200.000 men, the biggest stone throwing cart, the commanders, the 3000 carts that had travelled so far in order to be destroyed with one single attack. The lie was so big that at the end they resorted to saying that the troops fancied each other! The most stupid of all military lies.

The emperor Roman Divgen was arrested by a soldier called Hassan and was taken to Alp Arsalan. Hassan was a soldier who was almost expelled from the army by Nezam Al Molk in Tabriz because of his physical weakness and was allowed to stay on by the request of Guar Aeen who jokingly said that “he might just bring us the Roman emperor”, and in fact this is precisely what happened. Sultan Alp Arsalan due to his kind Turkish and Islamic character this time too forgave the Roman emperor and only after signing an agreement with him released him back into Constantinople.

Anoush Raavid. - The authors of these line were not only stupid themselves but also assumed the readers to be so too. In a battle field where there are 250 thousand soldiers and thousands of carts, a so called Hassan is found to arrest the emperor!!!

The paper battle,- The agreement was such that the emperor would pay a million and a half dinar of gold and also pay annually a sum of 360.000 gold pieces as taxation. In addition the Muslims would be free in Byzantine and as and when needed the emperor would help the sultan with military aid. Malazgirt, Urfa, Manbij, Antakya and the eastern part of Isqil Irmak would belong to the Turks.

Anoush Raavid, - An agreement was made up so that one day they could reclaim it all.

Iran's invasion by the Arabs, the second biggest lie in history.

Iran's invasion by the Moguls, the third biggest lie in history.

English: http://www.raavid.blogfa.com

Farsi: http://www.ravid.blogfa.com

Translated from Farsi by Farzin Malaki; farzinmalaki@yahoo.co.uk

Revelando las mentiras de la historia

En la historia y en la historia social hay muchas mentiras, mentiras que han influenciado el destino de la humanidad y desviado la planificación y el futuro, mentiras como las siguientes:

La invasión a Irán por Alejandro de Macedonia, la mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por los Árabes nómadas, la segunda mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por Chengiz el mogol, la tercera mentira más grande de la historia;

Mentiras significativas como la guerra de Gadesiyyeh y la batalla de Chaldran;

Mentiras sobre las culturas, como el helenismo…

Análisis e investigación de todas las mentiras de la historia en el blog:

Movimiento para erradicar las mentiras de la historia de Irán.

Únase a este movimiento y vea el mundo desde una perspectiva distinta.

Tour de Irán, visite todos los lugares históricos e interesantes, a muy buen

precio y con un excelente servicio. Favor contactar a:

http://www.khoonegeli.blogfa.com

Tour of Iran; visit all the historic and interesting places, competitive prices and excellent service, please contact:

aliagamalaki@hotmail.com

In order to understand the truth about history read all the articles in Anoush Raavid’s web logs: http://www.ravid.blogfa.com

The lies of history, Ancient history, Aryan history, The history of ancient Persia, the history of the art, the history of Alexander, the history of Hellenism, the history of the Arabs, the history of Genghis Khan and the Mongols, the history of the Uzbeks, the history of democracy and the revelation of the lies of history.

The New Imperialism and the Capitalism without Identity

The New Imperialism and the Capitalism without Identity

Prelude

I have often heard and seen that analysts have little knowledge of the first stage of the New Imperialism of the 21^st century and Capitalism without Identity and in general, confuse this Imperialism with that of the last century and especially the Imperialism of the first half of the twentieth century. Therefore they base their analysis and research on that perspective. Knowing historic facts and social evolution away from historic lies is of utmost importance in social, political and economic analysis of planners and policymakers. Most analysts and researches are above fifty years old and many view the capabilities of computers and internet as far as websites, emails and interchange of films and photographs and have no true idea of the role of this powerful tool that in true competition with humans is responsible for rapid changes in social evolution and history. It is important to have a true comprehension of erratic changes that occur in the 21^st century. I have explained this in the century of anti traditions and the blog campaign for the removal of lies from Iran’s history can also be of great help. Of course for those stuck in the 20^th century and before, understanding such issues is impossible but the new wave generation in the thought building workshop for the organization of looking into the future can benefit from them. In order to clarify such points I have prepared the following article and shall gradually expand and add to it. The well known tri lingual Persian, English and Spanish translator from Khoonegeli has voluntarily accepted the task of translating the articles of the weblog.

Anoush Raavid’s articles have no political preference neither do they represent a particular social movement; they are merely of geographic and historical interest.

Since the beginning of the 14^th century and with the appearance of the new bourgeoisie, especially in Venice and Amsterdam and its influence over the ancient continent meaning Western Asia and also Northern Africa, there appeared the civilization differences.

The European new bourgeoisie confronted the tribal organizations of this part of the globe. At that time Eastern Europe was going through the feudal period. This new bourgeoisie in two centuries managed to evolve into the bourgeoisie of the 16^th century and by building better ships began to consolidate its power superiority over other civilizations in the world.

It is important to remind ourselves that culture and its varieties are different from the history of civilization (social evolution) and its stages. For those interested please refer to the structures of social history.

Civilization differences over the centuries became less and less due to the evolution of societies, until now that we are in the 21^st century which is the subject of this article. Many historians view historic stages of colonialism and its continuation in the 20^th century i.e. Imperialism as cruel, evil and deadly, however, it is a phenomenon that has happened in human society and with knowledge of the 21^st century we will realize that it is no more than social history of human societies. Today, at the beginning of the 21^st century a new form of civilization has appeared in social history that has special geopolitics and strategy for which many use the terminology the New Imperialism although no specific name has been allocated by common consensus.

With the appearance of new technologies and internet and their widespread use in the communication revolution or explosion, the financial structures of the world have undergone radical changes. This is especially true in traditional or national Capitalism, International Capitalism which has been greatly influenced by the new technologies and has been transformed into a new form of Capitalism, - Capitalism without Identity or borderless Capitalism. Since the beginning of the 21^st century no one knows the true identity of the shareholders dealing in stock markets and what plans they have. We are faced with an organization that has no practical social principles, functions in a totally new way where there is a new theory of shortsightedness. It is not clear where the owners of the Capital are, from which country or bank, they simply do not want to be identified. This new Capitalism without identity needs to open new frontiers and has been created to achieve new aims for which the Imperialism of the 20^th century did not have the capabilities so what has come into the social evolutionary field to achieve these aims is called, for the time being, the New Imperialism.

The fall of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre was the end of the so called International Capitalism whose executor arm was the last stage of the Imperialism of the second half of the 20^th century. This fall was the beginning of Capitalism without borders and in order to achieve that there were the invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf.

In fact, the New Imperialism is of the software type which has come about as the result of human social evolution and it is inevitable. We can only appreciate it by having thorough knowledge of the capabilities of the internet and computers and pass thorough this stage.

The new software called the New Imperialism requires for its function a hardware which for the time being are the old Imperialists, and this hardware requires backup planning which the market of the new Capitalist without Identity manages. The real owners of this Capitalism may be anywhere and in any form, - for example it may be a monarch, a prime minister, a leader, a wealthy person, a banker or any other person who one would least expect. Therefore the sum of this Capitalism is looking for a complete economic hegemony and in order to achieve this creates a strategy that has no geopolitical basis and only seeks to protect its interests and this is in very difficult if not near impossible harmony with the masses, precisely the principles that require other factors to be involved. Many intellectuals fall short of a thorough analysis of the New Imperialism and Capitalism without Identity and view matters as black and white, superficially and at geographical level. In fact what we are seeing is a passing of a socio historic evolutionary stage. Of course analysis within geographical borders is necessary but one must also see the broader picture.

In order to clarify what I mean by the New Imperialism and Capitalism without Identity, I shall write a few lines about current economic and political affairs.

At the time of the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan by the US and its allies, the policymakers were living in the last stage of the 20^th century Imperialism. Technological changes rapidly shifted the world into a new era and no one could prevent an explosion in communication and information and the unity amongst the nations, be it the Taliban in Afghanistan or Saddam Hussein from Tekrit. The policymakers however were unable to fully appreciate this important factor. This lack of comprehension was clear in the faces of the prime ministers and the presidents of the invading countries. Neither they nor their advisers were able to fully analyze the new situation because they were all living still in the last stage of the social evolution and did not have enough knowledge of the history of social evolution.

In the remote past each evolutionary period used to take thousands of years and in recent centuries a few centuries and now it has diminished to a few years. They had not appreciated this rapid advance in evolutionary stages and still those that are sitting in their place have not fully realized this. For example, insistence in sending more troops and keeping them in parts of the old continent is a thinking of the last century. The new Capitalism without Identity is against such actions and is against sanctions against Iran for example which endangers its productions and plans. In order to fight the old traditional Capitalism such as sales of arms etc, the software of the New Imperialism has infiltrated the governments left over from the last century and has added to the confusion. In fact, the Capitalism without Identity is the owner of international Capitalism and the foundation of the New Imperialism and these two complement each other on whose rails the train of the current civilization is riding.

The masses, even those that are Capitalists without Identity or those playing their parts are all involved in the social evolutionary changes. Some analysts mistakenly view this evolutionary stage in the human civilization as economic, social and political crisis and hence mistakes are made in planning and policymaking.

This is a website for specialists in history and geography; therefore I wish not to fill it with stories and tales like the mass production books of the 20^th century.

All the stages of human civilization stem from economic methods, religions and cultures are also obey the economic lines and are created according to each economy. As I have said before events in the past used to take long to materialize and as time passes they become shorter and shorter and predicting the future becomes more and more difficult. What is obvious is that this stage will also pass but we can easily influence the future by reading and following Anoosh Ravid´s weblogs.

A couple of centuries ago the intellectuals of the time, in describing and analyzing socio historic structures divided the world into the Asian and the European production. In so dividing the world, they never explained each social or historic stage and only used expressions which were unique in their analysis. For example they used to say that Asian production had existed since the ancient past and was seen also in Europe and America, they used expressions without qualification and with utmost confusion and ambiguity as far as the social evolution is concerned. Therefore if we look at past analysis and not learn from them we have made a grave mistake and will be confused as a result. Writers and analysts living in the past centuries did not have the enormous communication and informational means available to us today so their views were very different.

The policymakers, planners and those in charge of the Imperialism of the second half of the 20^th century were a few aged people who could not appreciate the historical lies and did not know the realities of the turns of destiny. Therefore they left no impression of themselves as far as the principles of social evolution were concerned and what they had in mind was confined to the knowledge of Imperialism of the first half of the 20^th century. They had not even learned any lessons from the colonial era so had no vision for renewal or alternatives. From the beginning of the 21^st century, events caused by the information and communication revolution took us down new tracks which they knew nothing of and hence did not realize that the world was moving beneath their feet.

In the beginning of 2010 we see and hear that China and the US are facing against each other and in fact since the beginning of the century these two countries will not have be able to live without each other. By a simple analysis we realize that it is in fact the New Imperialism and Capitalism without Identity that is showing its face in China and against it is the final stage of the Imperialism of the 20^th century. Any thoughtful person who has become aware of the stages of social evolution by reading Anoush Raavid’s weblogs will realize which of these two will replace the other as the next stage in social evolution. According to this view point, New Imperialism unlike colonialism and Imperialism will not have national or nationalistic dependency or belong to a particular power or country but it will be managed by Capitalism without Identity and could be based anywhere.

In the continuation of social evolution of the material life of humanity, the foundation of the New Imperialism was laid in the latter decade of the 20^th century, formed in the first decade of the 21^st century and will evolve in the second decade and in the next decade it will transform itself into a new shape. In the second decade of the 21^st century countries and lands left over from the previous eras of material civilizations are doomed to destruction. In this decade extreme democracy and natural federalism which are the objectives of the New Imperialism and Capitalism without Identity become commonplace and eventually the civilization of materialism gives way to that of anti materialism.

I would invite all the parties interested in geography and history to participate in this discussion as to gain a common result. Continues…..

and the third biggest lie in history the attack of Genghis Khan in Anush Raavid's weblog titled the "campaign for erasing the lies from the history of Iran". Anoush Raavid / IRAN

Iran's invasion by the Arabs, the second biggest lie in history.

Iran's invasion by the Moguls, the third biggest lie in history.

English: http://www.raavid.blogfa.com

Farsi: http://www.ravid.blogfa.com

Translated from Farsi by Farzin Malaki; farzinmalaki@yahoo.co.uk

Revelando las mentiras de la historia

En la historia y en la historia social hay muchas mentiras, mentiras que han influenciado el destino de la humanidad y desviado la planificación y el futuro, mentiras como las siguientes:

La invasión a Irán por Alejandro de Macedonia, la mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por los Árabes nómadas, la segunda mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por Chengiz el mogol, la tercera mentira más grande de la historia;

Mentiras significativas como la guerra de Gadesiyyeh y la batalla de Chaldran;

Mentiras sobre las culturas, como el helenismo…

Análisis e investigación de todas las mentiras de la historia en el blog:

Movimiento para erradicar las mentiras de la historia de Irán.

Únase a este movimiento y vea el mundo desde una perspectiva distinta.

Tour de Irán, visite todos los lugares históricos e interesantes, a muy buen : http://www.khoonegeli.blogfa.com

precio y con un excelente servicio. Favor contactar a:

Tour of Iran; visit all the historic and interesting places, competitive prices and excellent service, please contact:

aliagamalaki@hotmail.com

In order to understand the truth about history read all the articles in Anoush Raavid’s web logs: http://www.raavid.blogfa.com

The lies of history, Ancient history, Aryan history, The history of ancient Persia, the history of the art, the history of Alexander, the history of Hellenism, the history of the Arabs, the history of Genghis Khan and the Mongols, the history of the Uzbeks, the history of democracy and the revelation of the lies of history.

Hellenism the big lie of the colonizers and the West

Hellenism the big lie of the colonizers and the West

Imperialists and colonizers influence all social and cultural as well as other aspects such as internal and external policy making of the underdeveloped and colonized countries which they dominate. This influence takes several forms and shapes, open and hidden as well as true and false. The influence takes shape in form of interfering in social, administrative and historic events of the dominated countries. They invent schools, philosophies, religions and much such nonsense in order to show themselves to be superior and us to be inferior, we must passionately defend our history and take it away from enemies paws.

Since the beginning of 19^th century colonizers who had taken over almost the whole world with massacres, lies and force were looking for their genealogical tree and the making of their superior race. For a couple of centuries before that they tried hard to make Rome as a symbol of culture and government and science and present a base for their antecedent but in Italy and Roman history there were not many useful evidence except for a few ruins that were not of much use for proving their race as superior, so they invented the lie that is known as Hellenism and made it big and important.

Underneath the mosques of Istanbul, the capital of the Ottomans, which were previously the Churches of the Eastern Roman Empire, they found papers that were not worth much during the Ottomans rule and there were not those who could read them well. They took these papers to London and Berlin and Paris and translated them and attached a whole lot of lies and stories to them and presented them as history and old events. These bits of papers were in their time written lies that were used in the Eastern Roman Empire to justify the Church and Synagogues and the making of a fabricated country in Anatolia and the Western part of Greater Iran and the Middle East.

Dear friend do not be so simple as to be fooled by these lies, please search for the real truth. Let us not allow the fabricated Hellenism be used to attack the world especially the Greater Iran. Why did they not invent the Parthianism? Have you asked yourself yet, where and how did the first documents of the fabricated Herodotus come from? Anush Ravid will no longer allow such lies be sold to the nations and it is hoped that you help with important task.

Hellenism was first used by a German historian in 1836 and thereafter it was used to distinguish a historic, political, cultural and artistic period in Greece marked by the appearance of governments in the fabricated Greek Empire's regions after the death of the fabricated Alexander the Great. The historians of the colonizers placed this period between 330 and 27 B.C. Why they did not extend this period to after the birth of Christ merits further thinking and questioning. The geographical regions Hellenism is supposed to have covered were north to south Russia, India and southern Egypt, Northern Africa and the Mediterranean coast. They considered the city of Taksila in Pakistan as belonging to the Hellenic era's works. They stupidly claim that after the conquest of the East by Alexander of Macedonia, there appeared a fusion of thoughts, religions and arts from East and West which changed the Greek architecture. Those stupid writers in order to attack the cultural richness of the Greater Iran write that; events, complexities and surprising advance of the Hellenic culture resulted in an architectural method with a huge and varied scale which was far superior to what a classic town and country could do at the time which needed a special advancement. Those idiots do not realize that this statement is in itself an obvious confession that Hellenism is a lie.

At the time of the invention of Hellenism we see the influence of the colonizers over the Ghajar dynasty which is clear to everyone; of course one can extend this interference to before and after the Ghajar period because essential and radical changes to Iran's social history had not been brought about to counter their interference. However, after two Imperial wars and the inability of the old colonizers to rule the world and their acquisition of new methodology which we call neo colonization, possibilities have risen for the nations to bring about useful and practical strategy to counter this influence.

In the fabrication of Hellenism much nonsense has been written, for example they say that "the art of Hellenism has influenced the art of the Parthian era a great deal and undoubtedly it is true but we cannot say anything about it because we have nothing tangible from them". Elsewhere they say "there is a great deal of original Iranian art in Hellenism and there is little Greek art in Hellenism which in any case is very transitory and superficial". Hertsfeld one of the agents of the colonizers is a famous researcher into Hellenism who has done a great deal of research in to the art of the Parthian era and he believes that the art of this period is a combination of Iranian and Greek paintings however it can be confirmed that the Iranian art has remained untouched in its original form in this period. One can see that all the stupid enemies of Iran believe that Hellenism is nonsense.

Throughout history colonizers have fabricated history in order to accomplish their objectives, they paint a pretty picture of democracy in the countries under their influence, create such institutions as parliaments, governments council, an independent judiciary and even political and military opposition etc in order to fooled the people. For example in this age of internet and satellite TV they create virtual caricaturist political movements in order to mislead mass movements and create an atmosphere of division and animosity between the peoples of the Greater Iran and they do this by fabricating history and lies. One of the games played by the same satellite agents is the lie that Arabs, Turks and the Kurds have been historically hostile to each other. Anush Ravid always asks the dear readers to be vigilant, for example, Iraq and Southern Persian Gulf region is a natural political and historic extension of the Greater Iran and all their affairs both in the past and present has to do with the Greater Iran. If one takes an opposing view saying that in the past they have been hostile and historically estranged, I believe it to be unrealistic, unprincipled and politically motivated and in a way fooled by the enemy's and colonizer's tricks. This is in no way a reason to send troops to or attack these areas politically but one must encourage the finding of historic realities and social history. Anonsh Raavid / IRAN

Iran's invasion by the Arabs, the second biggest lie in history.

Iran's invasion by the Moguls, the third biggest lie in history.

http://www.raavid.blogfa.com

Translated from Farsi by Farzin Malaki; farzinmalaki@yahoo.co.uk

Revelando las mentiras de la historia

En la historia y en la historia social hay muchas mentiras, mentiras que han influenciado el destino de la humanidad y desviado la planificación y el futuro, mentiras como las siguientes:

La invasión a Irán por Alejandro de Macedonia, la mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por los Árabes nómadas, la segunda mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por Chengiz el mogol, la tercera mentira más grande de la historia;

Mentiras significativas como la guerra de Gadesiyyeh y la batalla de Chaldran;

Mentiras sobre las culturas, como el helenismo…

http://www.ravid.tk

Análisis e investigación de todas las mentiras de la historia en el blog:

Movimiento para erradicar las mentiras de la historia de Irán.

Únase a este movimiento y vea el mundo desde una perspectiva distinta.

Tour de Irán, visite todos los lugares históricos e interesantes, a muy buen

precio y con un excelente servicio. Favor contactar a:

http://www.khoonegeli.blogfa.com

Tour of Iran; visit all the historic and interesting places, competitive prices and excellent service, please contact:

aliagamalaki@hotmail.com

Ancient history, Aryan history, The history of ancient Persia, the history of the art, the history of Alexander, the history of Hellenism, the history of the Arabs, the history of Genghis Khan and the Mongols, the history of the Uzbeks, the history of democracy and the revelation of the lies of history.

Chaldran, yet another lie

Chaldran, yet another lie

The battle of Chaldran is the key to the mystery of colonization, if we understand this battle; we shall know the reasons behind other lies in history. Anush Raavid invites you to think and analyse and not just accept whatever you hear or read unconditionally. It would be simple of us to think that whatever historic event or wars have occurred without preconditions in the evolution of social history. One must accurately analyse each event and consider what is important such as the change of generations and the birth rate, the hidden and the apparent interference of others, the setting of the political and economic stages and the potential of people's understanding of events at the time. We need planning, opportunity and patience together with 21^st century knowledge to remove the dirty paws of colonization that has gripped the world for the past 500 years. The story of Chaldran is the beginning of the fabrication of history and geography by the colonizers, with the invent of this story they considered the western part of Iran separated from the rest of the country and for the first time in history they created a frontier in the Greater Iran, and for affirming the existence of such frontier they included it in the textbooks. In the 15^th century three social historic civilizations collided with one another, the tribal institution, feudalism and bourgeoisie. Each of these three had and continues to have its own particular religion, culture, population growth and economy over which the natural geography of their environment has an influence. The tribes thought about their past, the feudalism about getting bigger and bourgeoisie about having more money.

The background to the battle of Chaldran

After the crusades, the Europeans became familiar with the East. This war was between the European feudalism and the eastern tribal system and although Europe lost that war, over a century, however, they experienced the knowledge and the trades of the east. This experience served to create the newly appeared bourgeoisie continuing the evolution of social history. With the fall of the most important feudal religious obstacle in Constantinople, this newly appeared bourgeoisie that was a product of the end of the crusades signified the end of the Middle Ages. Prior to this date the Europeans were unconditionally enslaved by feudalism and their knowledge before the crusades was much less than that of the people in the East, in the times of colonisations they always hid this fact. At that time East was ruled by tribal system which was very different from feudalism and that was beyond the comprehension of the European historians and therefore the two used to become confused. The tribal system in Europe had become extinct by the Romans centuries before and in Iran after the Achaemenidae the tribalism took a new shape to what it was after the last Neolithic tribal system. The crusades familiarized the Middle East with feudalism and within two or three centuries divided it into two main parts: the tribal part with its own particular religion and economy and the feudal part again with its own religion and economy that survives to the present day, and I shall come back to this point later on. In the 14^th century the Popes, bishops and the Churches were against each other apparently for religion but in reality for money. Since the beginning of 14^th century, ships from Venice and Geneva controlled the Mediterranean trades. In the 15^th century the economy of Western Europe grew rapidly. In the new world economy and acquisition of taxes of the bourgeoisie, Italy was leading in Europe and the Popes happy to be right at the centre of it. In these circumstances, the Popes and Italy could not tolerate a rival Byzantine that was still in the Middle Ages and had no intention of entering the new century. After the fall of the Eastern Rome, contractors hurried from Europe to Constantinople to convert Churches to Mosques so that the Vatican would become rival less sooner. The newly appeared bourgeoisie of northern Italian towns were able to function as independent governments by the means of their financial strength. They managed their budget in a new way and set a tax target of a million Ducats per capita per year. No agricultural or feudally structured government could reach that target. At the same time the newly appeared bourgeoisie of Holland was the intermediary in the sale of British and others' manufactured products. Therefore the northern Italian towns and Holland were becoming richer by the day, the new monetary and financial economy had come to Europe and the darkness of the Middle Ages were gone. Within a 200 year period, Europe woke up, of course in the form of a bourgeoisie that weighed everything and measured everything as being stable or unstable. Rapid developments necessitated new planning which are important to discuss but are out of the scope of the present article and I shall leave them to a separate writing in the future. In this period we see many travelogues by people from Europe and especially northern Italy to Iran which demonstrates a broad activity of the newly appeared bourgeoisie to find new markets and trade and or espionage. Few of these travelogues were scientific, logical and practical and most were intended for propaganda and marketing which survive to the present day.

Since the beginning of the 16^th century many lands and countries in the world became occupied by colonizers, however, none of the countries constituting the Greater Iran which included Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, the Caucasus, Tajikistan, part of Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan became occupied. In the Greater Iran due to a splendid historic background life continued with much enthusiasm and love for the nation and the people. Knowledge, comprehension and health were at high levels and there was much abundance. With a plan that needs analysis, the Ottomans were created within 50 years and they conquered much of Europe within 50 years without leaving much real impression in these hundred years. In order to glamorize and abuse history, bourgeoisie created stories from small and unimportant tribes such as the Turkmens with black and white sheep which gave much excitement to historical stories, they created many great battles for the Ottomans on paper in order to absolve themselves, in the eyes of the religious world, from the destruction of the churches of Eastern Rome.

In the absence of writings and cities of Russia, they created the Khans with the golden tents, placed much importance to the fighting of small and simple tribes for reasons that I shall come back to in the future. They want to create the impression in the mind of the reader that without historic background and social history wars occur and kings send their armies around. In these stories, their principal objective is oppressing the most historic and liveliest of nations amongst which Iran is at the top. They always write that the Iranians lost wars against foreign invaders and only defeated each other in their internal fighting and in this way the enemies, in the historic stories change a dynasty with another and shape history against the Iranians. In these stories they assume the Iranians to be as stupid as them and use simple analysis, for example they say that Iranians used to consider the use of firing weapons to be against manliness.

The telling of the fabricated battle of Chaldran

They say that Sultan Salem the 1^st was very important and powerful, in fact there is no mention of this so called Sultan in any early 16^th century book from Anatolia or Iran, Anush Raavid has not been able to find a single reference to his name in historic works and will continue his search and if anyone finds a mention please let him know. In reality this false Sultan could be a simple Sheikh in the hand of the European bourgeoisie in order to implement its plan. The stupid enemies of the history of Iran really were very simple and thought everyone to be so and that no one would be found to divulge the lies. They talk of a one hundred thousand man army that was beyond the 6 or 7 million population of the Ottoman territory; half of this population was Christian belonging to two different churches and the other half Muslims belonging to two different sects and each of these belonging to quite different social and geographic groups which in itself was a huge obstacle in gathering forces and a big war. Gathering such a force requires a booming economy based on productivity and tax collection and has to leave much evidence. Such an economy requires a solid social historic background which was not present in the 14^th century Ottoman. In the 21^st century and with such available technology if anyone believes such lies without research and analysis must be very gullible and easily lead by the enemy. They write about a thousand kilometre distance between the Ottoman capital and the war zone and the passing of such a huge force, a distance that was unimaginable to be passable up until a hundred years ago, a most arduous and difficult stretch to traverse. This huge force would have required a logistics which with the simplest of estimates would come to a half a million men which in turn needed an organization that would leave much evidence behind such as roads, bridges, accommodations, none of which is evident in history or the region.

At the time of the battle of Chaldran and other wars we see that the armies that fought real wars in Europe and left evidence behind in history, never exceeded 20 to 30,000 men because a higher number was not possible. They wrote the stage of the war in a place that could be a good geographical point for historic separation, in the whole region of Chaldran not a single gun or canon has been found, no single historic evidence has been uncovered.

They used fallacy and misleading language in their story telling of historical events in order to play tricks on simple minds, they have written "in the heart of the Iranian soldiers there was no agitation, they resisted until the moment of death against the well equipped Ottomans". They have written many such things; "the main reason for the victory of the Turks was their fiery weapons which the Iranian army did not possess". Elsewhere they have written that the aims of the Sultan Salem the 1^st of invading Iran was to: "halt the spread of Shiite sect believing in the 12 Imams which had been declared the official religion of Iran and the stopping of Ottoman Shiites joining the newly formed Safavid dynasty of Iran, annexation of the north western Kurdish regions and the place of residence of the Turkmens in eastern part of today's Turkey and north eastern Iraq that was of the Ak- Koyunlu, Kara-Koyunlu and the remaining of the Seljuqs to their territory and the spread of Iranism that had raised its head once again by the crowning of Shah Ismail of Safavids". There are a lot of such false quotes in the story of Chaldran. Can you analyse and explain these lies? It is the best test for you in finding the real truth behind these stories.

Study the history of canons and guns and do not accept unconditionally whatever nonsense as history. Do not believe the fiery weapons in the battle of Chaldran to be like the weapons of the Napoleon era in the films "The Battle of Waterloo" and "War and Peace". At the beginning of 16^th century the canons and the guns of the ottomans were wicked and matchlock and had a maximum range of 300 meters, they had to ignite the wick, charge the canon and then fire. On firing, a black smoke would fill the surrounding, and many balls would explode in the air or would not reach their intended target. Every 4 or 5 minutes they could prepare a canon to fire. A mounted soldier galloping at least 30 km per hour would run a distance of 500 meters in a minute hence bypassing the canons that were difficult to mobilize and attacking their operators. This fiery weapon was used in the 16^th century for attacking fortresses and not for open battles in fields. Matchlocks could fire every 2 minutes so mounted soldiers could attack the enemy in less than a minute and even if the first line of soldiers were killed by the guns the second line could easily reach and attack the gunners. For the aesthetics of the story they talked of the huge numbers of the Ottomans and the bravery of the Iranians, the fiery weapons and the superiority of the Ottomans and the disagreement of the Iranians with such weapons. With such words we are reminded of the negative advertising of Capitalism that said "don't buy Dena tires"!

Iran's invasion by the Arabs, the second biggest lie in history.

Iran's invasion by the Moguls, the third biggest lie in history.

http://www.raavid.blogfa.com

Translated from Farsi by Farzin Malaki; farzinmalaki@yahoo.co.uk

Revelando las mentiras de la historia

En la historia y en la historia social hay muchas mentiras, mentiras que han influenciado el destino de la humanidad y desviado la planificación y el futuro, mentiras como las siguientes:

La invasión a Irán por Alejandro de Macedonia, la mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por los Árabes nómadas, la segunda mentira más grande de la historia;

La invasión a Irán por Chengiz el mogol, la tercera mentira más grande de la historia;

Mentiras significativas como la guerra de Gadesiyyeh y la batalla de Chaldran;

Mentiras sobre las culturas, como el helenismo…

http://www.ravid.blogfa.com

Análisis e investigación de todas las mentiras de la historia en el blog:

Movimiento para erradicar las mentiras de la historia de Irán.

Únase a este movimiento y vea el mundo desde una perspectiva distinta.

Tour de Irán, visite todos los lugares históricos e interesantes, a muy buen

precio y con un excelente servicio. Favor contactar a:

http://www.khoonegeli.blogfa.com

Tour of Iran; visit all the historic and interesting places, competitive prices and excellent service, please contact:

aliagamalaki@hotmail.com

In order to understand the truth about history read all the articles in Anoush Raavid’s web logs: http://www.ravid.blogfa.com

Ancient history, Aryan history, The history of ancient Persia, the history of the art, the history of Alexander, the history of Hellenism, the history of the Arabs, the history of Genghis Khan and the Mongols, the history of the Uzbeks, the history of democracy and the revelation of the lies of history.